Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(1): 103-105, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37589089

RESUMO

We calculated the attributable cost of several healthcare-associated infections in a community hospital network: central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI-HOs) (43 hospitals); surgical site infections (SSIs) (40 hospitals). From 2016 to 2022, the total cost of CLABSIs, CAUTIs, CDI-HOs, and SSIs was $420,012,025.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Infecções por Clostridium , Infecção Hospitalar , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Hospitais Comunitários , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Sudeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(4): 429-433, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982291

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze Clostridioides difficile testing in 3 hospitals in central North Carolina to validate previous racial health-disparity findings. METHODS: We completed a retrospective analysis of inpatient C. difficile tests from 2015 to 2021 at 3 university-affiliated hospitals in North Carolina. We calculated the number of C. difficile tests per 1,000 patient days stratified by race: White, Black, and non-White, non-Black (NWNB). We defined a unique C. difficile test as one that occurred in an inpatient unit with a matching laboratory accession ID and on differing calendar days. Tests were evaluated overall, by hospital, by year, and by positivity rate. RESULTS: In total, 35,160 C. difficile tests and 2,571,850 patient days across all 3 hospitals from 2015 to 2021 were analyzed. The median number of C. difficile tests per 1,000 patient days was 13.85 (interquartile range [IQR], 9.88-16.07). Among all C. difficile tests, 5,225 (15%) were positive. White patients were administered more C. difficile tests (14.46 per 1,000 patient days) than Black patients (12.96; P < .0001) or NWNB race patients (10.27; P < .0001). Black patients were administered more tests than NWNB patients (P < .0001). White patients tested positive at a similar rate to Black patients (15% vs 15%; P = .3655) and higher than NWNB individuals (12%; P = .0061), and Black patients tested positive at a higher rate than NWNB patients (P = .0024). CONCLUSION: White patients received more C. difficile tests than Black and NWNB patient groups when controlling for race patient days. Future studies should control for comorbidities and investigate community onset of C. difficile by race and ethnicity.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hospitais , Comorbidade , Brancos
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(6): 954-958, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35838318

RESUMO

Policies that promote conversion of antibiotics from intravenous to oral route administration are considered "low hanging fruit" for hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs. We developed a simple metric based on digestive days of therapy divided by total days of therapy for targeted agents and a method for hospital comparisons. External comparisons may help identify opportunities for improving prospective implementation.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Administração Intravenosa , Políticas
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(3): 503-511, 2022 08 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34739080

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The impact of the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Management Bundle (SEP-1) core measure on overall antibacterial utilization is unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter longitudinal cohort study with interrupted time-series analysis to determine the impact of SEP-1 implementation on antibacterial utilization and patient outcomes. All adult patients admitted to 26 hospitals between 1 October 2014 and 30 September 2015 (SEP-1 preparation period) and between 1 November 2015 and 31 October 2016 (SEP-1 implementation period) were evaluated for inclusion. The primary outcome was total antibacterial utilization, measured as days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. RESULTS: The study cohort included 701 055 eligible patient admissions and 4.2 million patient-days. Overall antibacterial utilization increased 2% each month during SEP-1 preparation (relative rate [RR], 1.02 per month [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.00-1.04]; P = .02). Cumulatively, the mean monthly DOT per 1000 patient-days increased 24.4% (95% CI, 18.0%-38.8%) over the entire study period (October 2014-October 2016). The rate of sepsis diagnosis/1000 patients increased 2% each month during SEP-1 preparation (RR, 1.02 per month [95% CI, 1.00-1.04]; P = .04). The rate of all-cause mortality rate per 1000 patients decreased during the study period (RR for SEP-1 preparation, 0.95 [95% CI, .92-.98; P = .001]; RR for SEP-1 implementation, .98 [.97-1.00; P = .01]). Cumulatively, the monthly mean all-cause mortality rate/1000 patients declined 38.5% (95% CI, 25.9%-48.0%) over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Announcement and implementation of the CMS SEP-1 process measure was associated with increased diagnosis of sepsis and antibacterial utilization and decreased mortality rate among hospitalized patients.


Assuntos
Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente , Sepse , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Medicaid , Medicare , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(5): e219820, 2021 05 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33983399

RESUMO

Importance: Penicillin allergies are frequently mislabeled, which may contribute to use of less-preferred alternative antibiotics. Objective: To evaluate a pharmacist-led allergy assessment program's association with antimicrobial use and clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pharmacist-led allergy assessment program was launched in 2 phases (June 1, 2015, and November 2, 2016) at a single-center tertiary referral hospital. The longitudinal cross-sectional study included all study period adult admissions; hospitalwide outcomes were assessed by segmented regression. Individual outcomes were assessed within an embedded propensity score-matched case-control study of inpatients undergoing comprehensive allergy assessment following self-report of penicillin allergy. Analysis occurred from March 1, 2020, to February 29, 2020. Exposures: The longitudinal study analyzed hospital-level outcomes over 3 periods: preintervention (15 months), phase 1 (structured allergy history alone, 16 months), and phase 2 (comprehensive assessment including penicillin skin testing, 52 months). The case-control study defined cases as individuals undergoing comprehensive allergy assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital-level outcomes included antibiotic days of therapy per 1000 patient-days and hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) incidence per 10 000 patient-days. Individual outcomes included antibiotic selection, overall survival, and CDI-free survival. Results: Longitudinal analysis spanned 2014-2020 (median admissions, 46 416 per year; interquartile range [IQR], 46 001-50 091 per year). Hospitalwide, allergy histories were temporally associated with decreased use of nonpenicillin alternative antibiotics (rate ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97) and high-CDI-risk antibiotics (rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98). Penicillin skin testing was temporally associated with lower hospital-acquired CDI rates (rate ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.86). The embedded case-control study included 272 cases and 819 controls. Median age was 63 years (interquartile range, 51-73 years), 553 (50.7%) patients were women, and 229 (21.0%) patients were Black. Allergy-assessed patients were less likely to receive high-CDI-risk antibiotics at discharge (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.98). Estimated reductions in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55-1.07) and hospital-acquired CDI risk (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.18-1.55) were not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: Pharmacist-led allergy assessments may be associated with reduced high-CDI-risk antibiotic use at both hospitalwide and individual levels. Although individual reductions in mortality and CDI risk did not achieve significance, divergence of survival curves suggest longer-term benefits of allergy delabeling warrant future study.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Farmacêuticos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções por Clostridium/etiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Papel Profissional , Pontuação de Propensão , Fatores de Risco , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 10(1): 60, 2021 03 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33766135

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance has been named as one of the top ten threats to public health in the world. Hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) can help reduce antimicrobial resistance. The purpose of this study was to determine perceived barriers to the development and implementation of ASPs in tertiary care centers in three low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 45 physicians at tertiary care hospitals in Sri Lanka (n = 22), Kenya (12), and Tanzania (11). Interviews assessed knowledge of antimicrobial resistance and ASPs, current antimicrobial prescribing practices, access to diagnostics that inform antimicrobial use, receptiveness to ASPs, and perceived barriers to implementing ASPs. Two independent reviewers coded the interviews using principles of applied thematic analysis, and comparisons of themes were made across the three sites. RESULTS: Barriers to improving antimicrobial prescribing included prohibitively expensive antimicrobials, limited antimicrobial availability, resistance to changing current practices regarding antimicrobial prescribing, and limited diagnostic capabilities. The most frequent of these barriers in all three locations was limited drug availability. Many physicians in all three sites had not heard of ASPs before the interviews. Improved education was a suggested component of ASPs at all three sites. The creation of guidelines was also recommended, without prompting, by interviewees at all three sites. Although most participants felt microbiological results were helpful in tailoring antibiotic courses, some expressed distrust of laboratory culture results. Biomarkers like erythrocyte sedimentation rate and c-reactive protein were not felt to be specific enough to guide antimicrobial therapy. Despite limited or no prior knowledge of ASPs, most interviewees were receptive to implementing protocols that would include documentation and consultation with ASPs regarding antimicrobial prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlighted several important barriers to implementing ASPs that were shared between three tertiary care centers in LMICs. Improving drug availability, enhancing availability of and trust in microbiologic data, creating local guidelines, and providing education to physicians regarding antimicrobial prescribing are important steps that could be taken by ASPs in these facilities.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Quênia , Médicos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Sri Lanka , Tanzânia , Centros de Atenção Terciária
7.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(2): ofab008, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33575427

RESUMO

We examined the microbial burden on hospital room environmental sites after standard (quaternary ammonium [Quat]) or enhanced disinfection (quat/ultraviolet light [UV-C], bleach, or bleach/UV-C). An enhanced terminal room disinfection reduced the microbial burden of epidemiologically important pathogens on high-touch surfaces in patient rooms, especially sites around the bed, better than standard room disinfection.

8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(7): 1232-1240, 2021 04 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32133489

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We recently mitigated a clonal outbreak of hospital-acquired Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC), which included a large cluster of adult patients who developed invasive infection after exposure to heater-cooler units during cardiac surgery. Recent studies have detailed Mycobacterium chimaera infections acquired during cardiac surgery; however, little is known about the epidemiology and clinical courses of cardiac surgery patients with invasive MABC infection. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data on all patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital and subsequently had positive cultures for MABC from 2013 through 2016. Patients with ventricular assist devices or heart transplants were excluded. We analyzed patient characteristics, antimicrobial therapy, surgical interventions, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Ten cardiac surgery patients developed invasive, extrapulmonary infection from M. abscessus subspecies abscessus in an outbreak setting. Median time from presumed inoculation in the operating room to first positive culture was 53 days (interquartile range [IQR], 38-139 days). Disseminated infection was common, and the most frequent culture-positive sites were mediastinum (n = 7) and blood (n = 7). Patients received a median of 24 weeks (IQR, 5-33 weeks) of combination antimicrobial therapy that included multiple intravenous agents. Six patients required antibiotic changes due to adverse events attributed to amikacin, linezolid, or tigecycline. Eight patients underwent surgical management, and 6 patients required multiple sternal debridements. Eight patients died within 2 years of diagnosis, including 4 deaths directly attributable to MABC infection. CONCLUSIONS: Despite aggressive medical and surgical management, invasive MABC infection after cardiac surgery caused substantial morbidity and mortality. New treatment strategies are needed, and compliance with infection prevention guidelines remains critical.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas , Mycobacterium abscessus , Mycobacterium , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(10): 1127-1135, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32571447

RESUMO

To understand hospital policies and practices as the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) conducted a survey through the SHEA Research Network (SRN). The survey assessed policies and practices around the optimization of personal protection equipment (PPE), testing, healthcare personnel policies, visitors of COVID-19 patients in relation to procedures, and types of patients. Overall, 69 individual healthcare facilities responded in the United States and internationally, for a 73% response rate.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 38(1): 31-38, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27724988

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of multidrug-resistant gram-negative rod (MDR-GNR) infections on mortality and healthcare resource utilization in community hospitals. DESIGN Two matched case-control analyses. SETTING Six community hospitals participating in the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2012. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients admitted to study hospitals during the study period. METHODS Patients with MDR-GNR bloodstream and urinary tract infections were compared with 2 groups: (1) patients with infections due to nonMDR-GNR and (2) control patients representative of the nonpsychiatric, non-obstetric hospitalized population. Four outcomes were assessed: mortality, direct cost of hospitalization, length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates. Multivariable regression models were created to estimate the effect of MDR status on each outcome measure. RESULTS No mortality difference was seen in either analysis. Patients with MDR-GNR infections had 2.03 higher odds of 30-day readmission compared with patients with nonMDR-GNR infections (95% CI, 1.04-3.97, P=.04). There was no difference in hospital direct costs between patients with MDR-GNR infections and patients with nonMDR-GNR infections. Hospitalizations for patients with MDR-GNR infections cost $5,320.03 more (95% CI, $2,366.02-$8,274.05, P<.001) and resulted in 3.40 extra hospital days (95% CI, 1.41-5.40, P<.001) than hospitalizations for control patients. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides novel data regarding the clinical and financial impact of MDR gram-negative bacterial infections in community hospitals. There was no difference in mortality between patients with MDR-GNR infections and patients with nonMDR-GNR infections or control patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1-8.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitais Comunitários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , North Carolina/epidemiologia
11.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 38(1): 53-60, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27817759

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE To examine self-reported practices and policies to reduce infection and transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in healthcare settings outside the United States. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS International members of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network. METHODS Electronic survey of infection control and prevention practices, capabilities, and barriers outside the United States and Canada. Participants were stratified according to their country's economic development status as defined by the World Bank as low-income, lower-middle-income, upper-middle-income, and high-income. RESULTS A total of 76 respondents (33%) of 229 SHEA members outside the United States and Canada completed the survey questionnaire, representing 30 countries. Forty (53%) were high-, 33 (43%) were middle-, and 1 (1%) was a low-income country. Country data were missing for 2 respondents (3%). Of the 76 respondents, 64 (84%) reported having a formal or informal antibiotic stewardship program at their institution. High-income countries were more likely than middle-income countries to have existing MDRO policies (39/64 [61%] vs 25/64 [39%], P=.003) and to place patients with MDRO in contact precautions (40/72 [56%] vs 31/72 [44%], P=.05). Major barriers to preventing MDRO transmission included constrained resources (infrastructure, supplies, and trained staff) and challenges in changing provider behavior. CONCLUSIONS In this survey, a substantial proportion of institutions reported encountering barriers to implementing key MDRO prevention strategies. Interventions to address capacity building internationally are urgently needed. Data on the infection prevention practices of low income countries are needed. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016:1-8.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Isolamento de Pacientes , Autorrelato , Sociedades Médicas
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(10): 1156-61, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27477451

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE Ebola virus disease (EVD) places healthcare personnel (HCP) at high risk for infection during patient care, and personal protective equipment (PPE) is critical. Protocols for EVD PPE doffing have not been validated for prevention of viral self-contamination. Using surrogate viruses (non-enveloped MS2 and enveloped Φ6), we assessed self-contamination of skin and clothes when trained HCP doffed EVD PPE using a standardized protocol. METHODS A total of 15 HCP donned EVD PPE for this study. Virus was applied to PPE, and a trained monitor guided them through the doffing protocol. Of the 15 participants, 10 used alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) for glove and hand hygiene and 5 used hypochlorite for glove hygiene and ABHR for hand hygiene. Inner gloves, hands, face, and scrubs were sampled after doffing. RESULTS After doffing, MS2 virus was detected on the inner glove worn on the dominant hand for 8 of 15 participants, on the non-dominant inner glove for 6 of 15 participants, and on scrubs for 2 of 15 participants. All MS2 on inner gloves was observed when ABHR was used for glove hygiene; none was observed when hypochlorite was used. When using hypochlorite for glove hygiene, 1 participant had MS2 on hands, and 1 had MS2 on scrubs. CONCLUSIONS A structured doffing protocol using a trained monitor and ABHR protects against enveloped virus self-contamination. Non-enveloped virus (MS2) contamination was detected on inner gloves, possibly due to higher resistance to ABHR. Doffing protocols protective against all viruses need to incorporate highly effective glove and hand hygiene agents. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1-6.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/virologia , Bacteriófagos , Infecção Hospitalar/virologia , Ebolavirus , Luvas Protetoras/virologia , Higiene das Mãos/métodos , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola , Humanos , Profissionais Controladores de Infecções , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Médicos
14.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 62(2): 306-11, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24438554

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effect of nosocomial bloodstream infection (BSI) on older adults, including mortality, length of stay (LOS), and costs attributed to BSI. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight acute care hospitals (7 community hospitals and 1 tertiary university-affiliated facility) belonging to the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network (DICON) from the states of North Carolina and Virginia. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly patients over 65 years of age. MEASUREMENTS: A multistate, multicenter, matched, retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1994 through June 2002 in eight hospitals from the Southern-Central United States. Patients aged >65 years with nosocomial BSI were enrolled. Controls without bloodstream infection were matched to cases. Outcomes during the 90-day period following hospital discharge were evaluated to determine the association between BSI and mortality, hospital costs, and LOS. RESULTS: Eight-hundred thirty cases and 830 matched controls were identified, all with a mean age of 74.4 years. Among cases, 81% of BSIs were central line-associated and Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen accounting for 34.6% of infections (2/3 were methicillin resistant). The mortality rate of cases was 49.4%, compared to 33.2% for controls (OR = 2.1, P < .001), LOS was 29.2 days for cases and 20.2 days for controls (P < .001), and hospital charges were $102,276 for cases compared to $69,690 for controls (P < .001). The mean LOS and mean costs attributable to BSI were 10 days and $43,208, respectively. CONCLUSION: Nosocomial BSI in older adults was significantly associated with increases in 90-day mortality, increased LOS, and increased costs of care. Preventive interventions to eliminate nosocomial BSIs in older adults would likely be cost effective.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Custos Hospitalares , Tempo de Internação/economia , Idoso , Bacteriemia/economia , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Virginia/epidemiologia
15.
Am J Infect Control ; 41(9): 764-8, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23453162

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: State-specific, health care-associated infection (HAI) cost estimates have not been calculated to guide Department of Public Health efforts and investments. METHODS: We completed a cost identification study by conducting a survey of 117 acute care hospitals in NC to collect surveillance data on patient-days, device-days, and surgical procedures during 1 year. We then calculated expected rates and direct hospital costs of surgical site infections (SSI), Clostridium difficile infection, and 3 selected device-related HAIs for hospitals and the entire state using reference data sets such as the National Healthcare Safety Network. RESULTS: In total, 67 (53%) hospitals responded to the survey. The median bed size of respondent hospitals was 140 (interquartile range, 66-350). A "standard" NC hospital diagnosed approximately 100 HAI each year with estimated costs of $985,000 to $2.7 million. The most common HAI was SSI (73%). Costs related to SSI accounted for 87% to 91% of overall costs. In total, the overall direct annual cost of these 5 selected HAIs was estimated to be between $124.1 and $347.8 million in 2009 for the state of NC. CONCLUSION: Using conservative estimates, HAI led to costs of more than $100 million in acute care hospitals in the state of NC in 2009. The majority of costs were due to SSI.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/economia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/economia , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitais , Humanos , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/economia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
16.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 44(12): 948-55, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22831753

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of invasive surgical site infection (SSI) in the USA. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for SSI typically includes a cephalosporin. Vancomycin is used to provide MRSA coverage, but the timing of administration is challenging. Linezolid is an attractive agent for SSI prophylaxis, particularly for the prevention of SSI due to MRSA. METHODS: We developed a decision-analytic model to evaluate linezolid use for cardiothoracic SSI prophylaxis. A theoretical cohort of 10,000 cardiothoracic surgery patients was followed through 2 stages: (1) occurrence of SSI, and (2) mortality after SSI. All patients were administered cefuroxime, vancomycin, or linezolid between 1 and 180 min prior to surgical incision. SSIs were categorized into 3 pathogen categories: (1) methicillin-susceptible Gram-positive, (2) methicillin-resistant Gram-positive, and (3) other organisms. The most effective strategy resulted in the fewest SSIs. Assumptions for antibiotic effectiveness, impact of administration time, and pathogens were based on the published literature. RESULTS: Compared with cefuroxime, there was a 1% increase in the total number of SSIs in the linezolid group (mean SSI increase = 7), while there was a 12% increase in the vancomycin group (mean SSI increase = 86). Linezolid prophylaxis resulted in fewer SSIs due to methicillin-resistant Gram-positive infections (n = 108) compared with cefuroxime (n = 200, 46% reduction in the linezolid group) and vancomycin (n = 119, 9% reduction in the linezolid group). CONCLUSIONS: This simulation indicates that linezolid may offer benefits for SSI prophylaxis over existing prophylactic agents, particularly for the prevention of SSI due to Gram-positive methicillin-resistant pathogens.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/métodos , Acetamidas/administração & dosagem , Cefuroxima/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Incidência , Linezolida , Oxazolidinonas/administração & dosagem , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
17.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 32(4): 315-22, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21460482

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rates of several key outcomes and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) among hospitals that participated in the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network (DICON). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, observational cohort study of patients admitted to 24 community hospitals from 2003 through 2009. METHODS: The following data were collected and analyzed: incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), and HAIs caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); employee exposures to bloodborne pathogens (EBBPs); physician EBBPs; patient-days; central line-days; ventilator-days; and urinary catheter-days. Poisson regression was used to determine whether incidence rates of these HAIs and exposures changed during the first 5 and 7 years of participation in DICON; nonrandom clustering of each outcome was controlled for. Cost saved and lives saved were calculated on the basis of published estimates. RESULTS: In total, we analyzed 6.5 million patient-days, 4,783 EBPPs, 2,948 HAIs due to MRSA, and 2,076 device-related infections. Rates of employee EBBPs, HAIs due to MRSA, and device-related infections decreased significantly during the first 5 years of participation in DICON (P< .05 for all models; average decrease was approximately 50%); in contrast, physician EBBPs remained unchanged. In aggregate, 210 CLABSIs, 312 cases of VAP, 332 CAUTIs, 1,042 HAIs due to MRSA, and 1,016 employee EBBPs were prevented. Each hospital saved approximately $100,000 per year of participation, and collectively the hospitals may have prevented 52-105 deaths from CLABSI or VAP. The 7-year analysis demonstrated that these trends continued with further participation. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals with long-term participation in an infection control network decreased rates of significant HAIs by approximately 50%, decreased costs, and saved lives.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Hospitais Comunitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Patógenos Transmitidos pelo Sangue , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Hospitais Comunitários/economia , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções/economia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Distribuição de Poisson , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Regressão , Sudeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle
18.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 31(4): 357-64, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20184440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene noncompliance is a major cause of nosocomial infection. Nosocomial infection cost data exist, but the effect of hand hygiene noncompliance is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To estimate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-related cost of an incident of hand hygiene noncompliance by a healthcare worker during patient care. DESIGN: Two models were created to simulate sequential patient contacts by a hand hygiene-noncompliant healthcare worker. Model 1 involved encounters with patients of unknown MRSA status. Model 2 involved an encounter with an MRSA-colonized patient followed by an encounter with a patient of unknown MRSA status. The probability of new MRSA infection for the second patient was calculated using published data. A simulation of 1 million noncompliant events was performed. Total costs of resulting infections were aggregated and amortized over all events. SETTING: Duke University Medical Center, a 750-bed tertiary medical center in Durham, North Carolina. RESULTS: Model 1 was associated with 42 MRSA infections (infection rate, 0.0042%). Mean infection cost was $47,092 (95% confidence interval [CI], $26,040-$68,146); mean cost per noncompliant event was $1.98 (95% CI, $0.91-$3.04). Model 2 was associated with 980 MRSA infections (0.098%). Mean infection cost was $53,598 (95% CI, $50,098-$57,097); mean cost per noncompliant event was $52.53 (95% CI, $47.73-$57.32). A 200-bed hospital incurs $1,779,283 in annual MRSA infection-related expenses attributable to hand hygiene noncompliance. A 1.0% increase in hand hygiene compliance resulted in annual savings of $39,650 to a 200-bed hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene noncompliance is associated with significant attributable hospital costs. Minimal improvements in compliance lead to substantial savings.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/economia , Desinfecção das Mãos/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Custos Hospitalares , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/economia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Desinfecção das Mãos/métodos , Humanos , Higiene , Controle de Infecções , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente , North Carolina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão
19.
PLoS One ; 4(12): e8305, 2009 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20016850

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The clinical and financial outcomes of SSIs directly attributable to MRSA and methicillin-resistance are largely uncharacterized. Previously published data have provided conflicting conclusions. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a multi-center matched outcomes study of 659 surgical patients. Patients with SSI due to MRSA were compared with two groups: matched uninfected control patients and patients with SSI due to MSSA. Four outcomes were analyzed for the 90-day period following diagnosis of the SSI: mortality, readmission, duration of hospitalization, and hospital charges. Attributable outcomes were determined by logistic and linear regression. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In total, 150 patients with SSI due to MRSA were compared to 231 uninfected controls and 128 patients with SSI due to MSSA. SSI due to MRSA was independently predictive of readmission within 90 days (OR = 35.0, 95% CI 17.3-70.7), death within 90 days (OR = 7.27, 95% CI 2.83-18.7), and led to 23 days (95% CI 19.7-26.3) of additional hospitalization and $61,681 (95% 23,352-100,011) of additional charges compared with uninfected controls. Methicillin-resistance was not independently associated with increased mortality (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 0.70-4.20) nor likelihood of readmission (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.89) but was associated with 5.5 days (95% CI 1.97-9.11) of additional hospitalization and $24,113 (95% 4,521-43,704) of additional charges. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The attributable impact of S. aureus and methicillin-resistance on outcomes of surgical patients is substantial. Preventing a single case of SSI due to MRSA can save hospitals as much as $60,000.


Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/fisiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/complicações , Infecções Estafilocócicas/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/complicações , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Preços Hospitalares , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Análise de Sobrevida
20.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 57(1): 46-54, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19054183

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of surgical site infection (SSI) on mortality, duration of hospitalization, and hospital cost in older operative patients. DESIGN: Retrospective matched-outcomes study. SETTING: Eight hospitals, including Duke University Medical Center, and seven community hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 65 and older undergoing surgery from 1991 to 2003. Cases were defined as patients who developed deep incisional or organ or space SSI; controls were operative patients who did not develop SSI. Controls were frequency matched to cases according to type and year of operative procedure and to hospital in a 1:1 ratio. MEASUREMENTS: Mortality, duration of hospitalization (including re-admissions), and hospital charges for the 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study: 561 cases with SSI and 576 controls without SSI. In cases, the most common SSI pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (n=275, 51.6%). Of S. aureus isolates, 58.2% were methicillin resistant. One hundred sixteen subjects died within 90 days of surgery (8.6%). In multivariable analysis, SSI was associated with greater mortality risk (odds ratio (OR)=3.51, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.20-5.59), 2.9 times longer postoperative hospitalization (95% CI=2.61-3.13), and 1.9 times greater hospital charges (95% CI=1.78-2.10). CONCLUSION: In elderly operative patients, SSI was associated with almost 4 times greater mortality, a mean attributable duration of hospitalization after surgery of 15.7 days (95% CI=13.9-17.6) and mean attributable hospital charges of $43,970 (95% CI=$31,881-56,060).


Assuntos
Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Preços Hospitalares , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA